Second Chance Bail Bonds N.H. v. Castine

Line of Business : Bail
State : New Hamshire
Case Date : 13/02/2019
Case Description :

In Second Chance Bail Bonds N.H. v. Castine, 2019 N.H. LEXIS 30 (Feb. 13, 2019), a bail bond was forfeited after the arrestee for whom it was posted violated several bail conditions. In its defense, the surety argued that the trial court may only forfeit a bail bond if the arrestee failed to appear, because it is an "appearance bond." The supreme court disagreed, observing that the bail conditions, which in this case included the requirement to refrain from drug use, were listed on the bond itself. Because the arrestee was revived from a drug overdose, with drugs found on his person, the supreme court found no abuse of discretion by the trial court in its conclusion that the arrestee violated his bail conditions. Further, the supreme court found no support for the surety's argument that the trial court lacked authority to forfeit the bond for the violation of a non-appearance condition. Instead, the supreme court found that RSA 597:31 directly empowers the trial court to forfeit a bail bond when any of its conditions are breached. Accordingly, the supreme court affirmed the judgment of forfeiture.

Case Description :

In Second Chance Bail Bonds N.H. v. Castine, 2019 N.H. LEXIS 30 (Feb. 13, 2019), a bail bond was forfeited after the arrestee for whom it was posted violated several bail conditions. In its defense, the surety argued that the trial court may only forfeit a bail bond if the arrestee failed to appear, because it is an “appearance bond.” The supreme court disagreed, observing that the bail conditions, which in this case included the requirement to refrain from drug use, were listed on the bond itself. Because the arrestee was revived from a drug overdose, with drugs found on his person, the supreme court found no abuse of discretion by the trial court in its conclusion that the arrestee violated his bail conditions. Further, the supreme court found no support for the surety’s argument that the trial court lacked authority to forfeit the bond for the violation of a non-appearance condition. Instead, the supreme court found that RSA 597:31 directly empowers the trial court to forfeit a bail bond when any of its conditions are breached. Accordingly, the supreme court affirmed the judgment of forfeiture.

Share this entry

Surety Protects
Learn how surety
bonds protect taxpayers,
save time,
reduce costs and
keep projects on track.
U.S. Senate Unanimously Supports Surety Bonds and the Protections and Economic Value They Provide to Our Nation’s Critical Infrastructure Development
See Senators Capito, Carper and Van Hollen speak on the Senate floor about the importance of surety.

The Surety & Fidelity Association of America Foundation Awards 19 Students With $47,500 in Scholarships

SFAA Foundation announces 19 students selected as recipients of a $2,500 scholarship as part of the Surety and Fidelity Intern and Scholarship Program for 2023.

News & Events

SFAA Members Elect Board and Highlight Strategic Priorities at 118th Annual Meeting

The Surety & Fidelity Association of America (SFAA), a nonprofit, nonpartisan trade association representing all segments of the surety and fidelity industry, held its 118th Annual Meeting this past week, an event focused on advancing the industry’s future.

Surety Industry Advances Critical Federal Policy

SFAA and NASBP led a Legislative Fly-In with members from across the industry to educate Congress on the value of construction surety bonds and advocate for key legislative priorities. Surety professionals held over 135 meetings with policymakers and staff to emphasize the significant savings that surety bonding provides to taxpayers across the country.

The Surety & Fidelity Association of America Foundation Awards Record $90,000 in Scholarships

The Surety & Fidelity Association of America Foundation (SFAA Foundation) has awarded a record $90,000 in scholarships to thirty-one students through its Surety and Fidelity Intern and Scholarship Program.